Understanding EBV+ PTLD

What is EBV+ PTLD?

Epstein–Barr virus (EBV)-positive 
post-transplant lymphoproliferative 
disorder (PTLD) – or EBV+ PTLD – is a 
serious complication that can occur 
following solid organ transplant (SOT) 
or haematopoietic cell transplant (HCT).1,2

It develops when T-cell control of EBV infection or reactivation of latent infection is lost, allowing EBV-infected B cells to proliferate uncontrollably.1,2,4

Although EBV+ PTLD can be aggressive and 
life-threatening,1,3 growing understanding 
of its biology and treatment pathways is 
helping physicians manage this complex 
condition with greater clarity and confidence.

EBV, a y-herpes virus, is present in

≥90% of adults4

EBV persists as a lifelong latent infection within memory B cells in most people1,4
 

 

EBV+ PTLD can be aggressive, life-threatening, and remains a challenging disease to manage2,5,6

How EBV+ PTLD develops

EBV infection early in life can remain hidden, and in transplant patients the loss 
of immune control may allow it to progress into EBV+ PTLD.3,7

01 Primary infection

EBV typically establishes infection early 
in life by invading host B cells3

Simplifed model for illustrative purposes only.

02 Latency

Cytotoxic T cells normally recognise and 
clear EBV-infected B cells, but some escape 
detection, creating latent infection3,7

03 Loss of immune control

In immunocompromised patients, such as 
transplant recipients, EBV cannot be 
controlled efficiently, allowing uncontrolled 
proliferation of infected B cells and 
the development of EBV+ PTLD3,7

Role of immunosuppression

Although the type of immunosuppression differs between SOT and HCT, 
both settings can impair T-cell control, enabling EBV-infected B cells to expand 
and contribute to the development of PTLD. 

Solid organ transplant (SOT)

Haematopoietic cell transplant (HCT)

Immunosuppression to prevent allograft rejection2

Induction therapy is given during the peri-transplant period

Maintenance therapy begins at transplantation and continues 
for the lifetime of the graft

Immunosuppression1

Conditioning regimens given before donor stem cell infusion

Immunosuppressive agents administered post-transplant

EBV infection1,2

EBV-infected B cells proliferate due to impaired T-cell immunity

Extended B-cell lifespan allows for genetic aberrations

Reduced T-cell surveillance is a key driver 
of EBV+ PTLD2

T-cell dysfunction combined with cytokine-driven 
inflammation is a major risk factor for EBV+ PTLD1

Typical cell of origin: 
predominantly recipient-derived1

Typical cell of origin: 
donor-derived1

Rates of EBV+ PTLD after transplant
 

After SOT

After SOT

1-33%

1st year post-transplant risk is highest1,8

7–10 years later a second peak occurs8

4–5.3 years median time to PTLD onset, 
due to taking lifelong immunosuppressives1

 

 

After HCT

0.8-4% Incidence
100% EBV-associated PTLD Ref9

EBV+ PTLD usually occurs within 12 months1

Only 4% of cases develop after 1 year10

2–4 months median time to PTLD onset10

PTLD cases >5 years post-HCT are extremely rare as immunosuppression is usually discontinued1

*After SOT, incidence of PTLD varies by organ type, pre-transplant EBV antibody status, and patient age;3 after HCT, incidence varies by patient factors, stem cell source, HLA mismatch, and conditioning regimen.1

Rate of EBV+ PTLD after HCT


Rate of EBV+ PTLD 
after HCT

In a multicentre retrospective study of 127 patients with PTLD following allogeneic HCT, incidence peaked 2–3 months after transplantation and declined sharply thereafter11

 

Adapted from Landgren O, et al. Blood. 2009.

 

Rate of EBV+ PTLD after HCT

Time to PTLD after SOT

Median time to diagnosis of PTLD by organ type:12*



Time to PTLD 
after SOT
(by organ)

A single-centre retrospective study found that PTLD developed later after heart transplantation compared with other SOTs, consistent with findings reported elsewhere12

*Out of 66 patients identified with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of PTLD, 50 were EBV+, 10 were unknown, and 6 were EBV-negative.

 

 

time-to-PTLD-after-SOT

Your feedback matters

Select below on a scale from 0–10:

How likely are you to recommend this website to a colleague?
Unlikely
Highly Likely
How likely are you to incorporate the learnings from this website into your clinical practice?
Unlikely
Highly Likely
References
  1. Fujimoto A, Suzuki R. Cancers (Basel). 2020;12(2):328. 
  2. Dierickx D, Habermann TM. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(6):549–62. 
  3. Nijland ML, et al. Transplant Direct. 2015;2(1):e48. 
  4. Cohen JI. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(7):481–92. 
  5. Shahid S, Prockop SE. Cancer Drug Resist. 2021;4(3):646–64. 
  6. Canichella M, de Fabritiis P. Antibodies (Basel). 2025;14(2):47.  
  7. Zimmermann H, Trappe RU. Ther Adv Hematol. 2011;2(6):393–407. 
  8. Allen UD, Preiksaitis JK. Clin Transplant. 2019;33(9):e13652. 
  9. Socié G, et al. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2024;59(1):52–8. 
  10. Styczynski J, et al. Haematologica. 2016;101(7):803–11. 
  11. Landgren O, et al. Blood. 2009;113(20):4992–5001. 
  12. Lau E. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13(4):899.
Abbreviations
  • Ci, confidence interval
  • EBV(+), Epstein-Barr virus(positive)
  • HCT, haematopoietic cell transplantation
  • HLA, human leukocyte antigen
  • PTLD, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder
  • SOT, solid organ transplant